The Most Controversial Trading Cards Ever? Inside the 1987 “Terrorist Attack” Set
In the weird world of trading cards, few sets have sparked as much controversy or curiosity - as the 1987 “Terrorist Attack” cards. Produced by the Piedmont Candy Company, these cards were marketed as educational tools but quickly became infamous for their shocking subject matter. Today, they stand as one of the most talked-about card sets of the 1980s.
Who Made Them and Why?
Released during the height of Cold War tension and global unrest, the “Terrorist Attack” trading cards were created to highlight real-life terrorist incidents and groups. The cards featured dramatic illustrations and brief descriptions of events, people, and factions involved in terrorism around the world. The intention may have been to educate, but the execution left many feeling uncomfortable.
Backlash and Immediate Discontinuation
Within weeks of hitting store shelves, the backlash came fast. Parents, educators, and media outlets blasted the cards for being insensitive, especially since they were packaged like candy and marketed to kids. Accusations that the set sensationalized violence and fear led to public outrage. Facing mounting criticism, Piedmont Candy pulled the plug and discontinued production almost immediately.
A Controversial Collector’s Item Today
Ironically, what was once seen as distasteful has now become highly collectible. Surviving packs of “Terrorist Attack” cards are rare and often sell for hundreds of dollars online. They serve as a bizarre reminder of how pop culture, politics, and profit can collide in strange ways. For some collectors, they’re a piece of misunderstood history. For others, they’re a cautionary tale in marketing gone wrong.
What Makes Them So Unique?
- 🕹️ Produced in 1987 by Piedmont Candy Co.
- 💣 Each card featured a terrorist group, event, or individual
- 🚫 Banned quickly due to public backlash
- 📈 Extremely rare and collectible today
Ethics, Education, and Entertainment
These cards continue to spark debate even decades later. Should collectibles cover real-world tragedy? Can educational content ever justify using violence as a theme? The “Terrorist Attack” cards force us to ask where the line is and whether it was crossed in the name of curiosity and commerce.
Seen One in the Wild?
If you own any of these cards or remember seeing them back in the day, we’d love to hear from you. Drop a comment and let’s talk about this strange piece of trading card history!
Comments
Post a Comment