Fanatics vs Panini Antitrust Fight: What It Means for Licenses, Products, and Prices

Image
Fanatics vs. Panini: What the Antitrust Heat Could Mean for Licenses, Products, and Prices Fanatics locked up a raft of long exclusive trading-card licenses with the big U.S. leagues and players’ unions, then bought Topps. Panini sued for antitrust. A federal judge let the core claims move forward. Discovery is now spicy, with Fanatics ordered to hand over unredacted licensing deals to Panini’s lawyers. If you care about what logos show up on the box you rip and how much you pay, this fight matters. How we got here The license grab. Fanatics struck exclusive card deals that, by 2025–2026, put most major U.S. league and union rights under its roof for a decade or more. Panini called foul and sued in 2023. What the court said. In March 2025, the judge dismissed some counts but kept the core antitrust claims alive. Translation: the heart of the case is going to be litigated, not tossed. Discovery fireworks. In July 2025, a magistrate judge ordered Fanatic...

The Controversial Collectibles: A Look Back at the 1987 "Terrorist Attack" Trading Cards

The Most Controversial Trading Cards Ever? Inside the 1987 “Terrorist Attack” Set

In the weird world of trading cards, few sets have sparked as much controversy — or curiosity — as the 1987 “Terrorist Attack” cards. Produced by the Piedmont Candy Company, these cards were marketed as educational tools but quickly became infamous for their shocking subject matter. Today, they stand as one of the most talked-about card sets of the 1980s.

Who Made Them — and Why?

Released during the height of Cold War tension and global unrest, the “Terrorist Attack” trading cards were created to highlight real-life terrorist incidents and groups. The cards featured dramatic illustrations and brief descriptions of events, people, and factions involved in terrorism around the world. The intention may have been to educate — but the execution left many feeling uncomfortable.

Backlash and Immediate Discontinuation

Within weeks of hitting store shelves, the backlash came fast. Parents, educators, and media outlets blasted the cards for being insensitive, especially since they were packaged like candy and marketed to kids. Accusations that the set sensationalized violence and fear led to public outrage. Facing mounting criticism, Piedmont Candy pulled the plug and discontinued production almost immediately.

A Controversial Collector’s Item Today

Ironically, what was once seen as distasteful has now become highly collectible. Surviving packs of “Terrorist Attack” cards are rare and often sell for hundreds of dollars online. They serve as a bizarre reminder of how pop culture, politics, and profit can collide in strange ways. For some collectors, they’re a piece of misunderstood history. For others, they’re a cautionary tale in marketing gone wrong.

What Makes Them So Unique?

  • 🕹️ Produced in 1987 by Piedmont Candy Co.
  • 💣 Each card featured a terrorist group, event, or individual
  • 🚫 Banned quickly due to public backlash
  • 📈 Extremely rare and collectible today

Ethics, Education, and Entertainment

These cards continue to spark debate even decades later. Should collectibles cover real-world tragedy? Can educational content ever justify using violence as a theme? The “Terrorist Attack” cards force us to ask where the line is — and whether it was crossed in the name of curiosity and commerce.

Seen One in the Wild?

If you own any of these cards or remember seeing them back in the day, we’d love to hear from you. Drop a comment and let’s talk about this strange piece of trading card history!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Frank Thomas 1990 Topps “No Name On Front” Rookie

Sonic Meets Magic: The Gathering - The Secret Lair Drop That’s Electrifying Collectors

Top 10 Rookie Cards to Watch for the 2025 NFL Season